Defensive overlay design
QIS-based implementation
Governance-ready process

Most portfolios are not well-hedged. They are simply not yet stressed.

How do we protect the portfolio against both sudden shocks and slow, grinding drawdowns — without permanently sacrificing return?
How do we implement a hedging programme that holds up in front of an investment committee?
How do we deploy QIS systematically, with the governance and process clarity our institution requires?

How Resonanz Capital Builds Investment Solutions

Define the Risk Path First

Before any instrument is selected, we define exactly what we are protecting against. The risk path determines the solution. Not the other way around.

Overlay Design and QIS Implementation

We design and implement defensive overlays using QIS structures and liquid alternatives — built to a specific objective and implementable within your existing framework.

Ongoing Management and Reporting

Continuous oversight, reporting built for investment committees. Every decision documented. Every rationale explainable.

Two distinct risk profiles. Two distinct solutions.

 

Not all portfolio risk looks the same. Sudden dislocations require convexity structures that respond immediately. Persistent drawdowns require dynamic, directionally-responsive strategies. We map which risk path applies, then design implementation accordingly.

  • Convexity structures for event and tail risk protection
  • Trend-following and systematic overlays for drawdown resilience
  • Combined frameworks for portfolios exposed to both risk types simultaneously

QIS as infrastructure for disciplined risk management.

 

Quantitative Investment Strategies (QIS) offers rules-based logic, transparent documentation, and repeatable behaviour across market cycles. We source, structure, and manage exposures across multiple providers — designed to behave predictably when the portfolio needs it most.

  • Open-architecture QIS selection across multiple providers — not a single-bank wrapper
  • Transparent strategy logic, documented to investment committee standard
  • Scalable capacity with daily liquidity and defined execution protocols

A hedge that cannot be executed when it matters is not a hedge.

 

A hedge that cannot be acted upon in stress is a contingency plan with no trigger. We build solutions with pre-agreed monetisation frameworks, clear governance, and operational readiness — so the response is already defined when it matters most.

  • Pre-agreed monetisation and rebalancing protocols embedded in every programme
  • Attribution by source of risk and return, not headline performance alone
  • Reporting structured for investment committee review from day one

A structured path to implementation.

Define your risk objectives

Share your portfolio context and governance requirements. We start from where you are.

Receive a structured solution design

We develop an overlay blueprint with clear rationale, instrument selection, and governance documentation.

Implement with confidence

Deploy a solution you can explain and report on — managed with ongoing oversight by the team that designed it.

Receive regular investment content

Subscribe to get our thinking on defensive strategies, QIS, and multi-strategy investing, delivered directly to your inbox.

Read our thinking

Monthly QIS Review - March 2026

March delivered a classic energy-shock regime: sharp moves in oil and rates dominated cross-asset behavior, and QIS outcomes largely followed the playbook—trend and convexity held up, while carry, liquidity, and credit risk premia ...
5 min read

Systematic Multi-Strategy vs. Discretionary Pod Platforms: Different Engines, Different Risk

The drawdown that rattled markets in March — triggered by a sharp escalation in Middle East tensions and rapid repositioning in energy and rates — did something useful. It separated two structures that are routinely grouped under the same ...
8 min read

Performance Fee Fairness: What Hedge Fund LPs Actually Pay

Two investors can subscribe to the same hedge fund, on the same headline terms, and still end up paying different effective performance fees. That is not a legal curiosity. It is a portfolio issue — and it deserves more attention than most ...
8 min read