For two decades “quant” and “discretionary” sat in different chapters of the hedge-fund playbook. Yet in the wake of crowded factor premia, shrinking bid-ask spreads, and a brutal war for talent, the sharpest electronic-trading firms are stitching the two approaches together. Below are several stories that — taken together — trace a single theme: the fastest names in finance are broadening their time-horizons, asset coverage, and research methods by importing human stock-pickers and longer-duration risk into their low-latency factories.

Hudson River Trading: when microseconds fund multi-day bets

Hudson River Trading’s 2024 haul — nearly $8 billion of net trading revenue — came not only from its classic equity-market-making engine but also from "Prism", a unit that runs systematic credit, macro futures, and cross-asset stat-arb books with holding periods measured in days or weeks. The firm now trades in 200-plus venues, has doubled headcount since 2021, and finances expansion with an investment-grade term loan, signaling institutional ambitions beyond the original HFT niche.

HRT’s story shows how an HFT core (cheap data, deterministic code, microscopic spreads) can bankroll riskier strategies that depend on capacity, leverage, and patient capital — turning speed into staying power.

Citadel Securities: rebuilding the pipes for an “asset-agnostic” future

Ken Griffin’s market-maker already executes one in four US equity trades, yet its tech chiefs spent 2024 ripping up and re-architecting the firm’s entire stack. The goal: a single, modular system that can price, risk, and clear options, rates, credit, and FX across 150 venues in 50 markets without bespoke code each time a new exchange comes online. Executives liken the project to “stretching” — keeping the core elastic enough to break into fresh products without accruing operational debt.

A cleaner architecture lets Citadel pair its millisecond liquidity-provision business with mid-frequency relative-value strategies that need shared data models and unified risk capital. Technology, not new offices, is now the bottleneck. 

Qube Research & Technologies: an external-pod army via SMAs

London-based Qube, managing roughly $20 billion, has hired or seeded 44 fundamental stock-picking teams through separately managed accounts. The external managers keep ownership of their businesses but feed real-time positions into Qube’s risk book, letting the parent firm hedge index, sector and factor exposures centrally. The SMAs give the fund transparency into positions and risk while letting the traders stay independent and raise money elsewhere—a structure that turns the firm into both allocator and central risk book.  Leadership aims to back 100 pods within a few years, effectively turning the quant shop into a capital allocator that arbitrages research styles rather than factors alone.

Because the SMAs sit outside the main fund umbrella, Qube can experiment quickly, cut capacity when signals degrade, and recycle prime-broker relationships — an “open platform” version of the pod model.

Squarepoint Capital: converting alpha capture into a dispersion book

SquarePoint’s answer is an alpha-capture flywheel beside the discretionary pods. Dozens of outside discretionary funds stream their live trade blotters to Squarepoint; the manager resizes, hedges, and aggregates those signals into an internal equity-dispersion portfolio that runs at low net exposure but high stock-specific risk. The firm only allocates externally to non-systematic strategies and styles it does not run internally, ensuring complementarities rather than cannibalization.

The result is a self-reinforcing loop: the more outside managers join, the fresher the signal pool, and the better the central book’s statistical edge — without Squarepoint having to hire hundreds of analysts.

Marshall Wace Alpha Plus: London’s “anti-pod shop” takes shape

Marshall Wace popularized systematic alpha capture with its TOPS strategy. In 2023 it quietly launched Alpha Plus, a platform including discretionary equity-market-neutral inside the firm’s risk framework, staffed by portfolio managers poached from peers, some from Citadel, D. E. Shaw and Millennium. Business Insider now puts Marshall Wace on every “funds-to-watch” list for 2025, citing double-digit returns and an aggressive talent drive.

While details are private, industry sources say Alpha Plus differs from the US model by limiting leverage and encouraging cross-pod collaboration rather than zero-sum capital allocations — an attempt to graft discretionary judgment onto a culture long defined by systematic research. The project sits alongside a broader talent offensive that saw the firm open an Abu Dhabi office and embed a “talent surcharge” in fees to finance ongoing hiring. 

The next wave: Engineers Gate, Two Sigma, and beyond

The hybrid playbook is spreading. Engineers Gate is building a fundamental equities pod in Asia, while Two Sigma has hired veteran stock-pickers from Maverick and GIC to complement its factor engines. Even D.E. Shaw now lists more discretionary than pure-systematic strategies on its website. These moves echo the same refrain: diversify alpha sources before crowding or regime shifts erode the old ones. 

What it means for investors

The line between “fast money” quants and “deep-dive” stock-pickers is blurring into a spectrum. Platforms that once competed on millisecond execution are now competing on research talent, portfolio-construction disciplines, and capital-allocation algorithms. For allocators, due diligence can no longer rely on the old style boxes; understanding how a firm integrates humans and machines, and how it manages cross-asset liquidity shocks, is the new edge.

Qube, Squarepoint, Marshall Wace & Co. are no longer just statistical arbitrage shops; they are becoming platforms that ingest all forms of edge — machine-generated signals, sell-side research, broker flow, and now human intuition. The hope is that a mosaic of small, uncorrelated bets will outrun the commoditization of any single style. If 2024’s returns are a down-payment, the experiment is off to a strong start.

Yet integration risk remains. Cultural clashes between data scientists and old-school fundamentalists can derail collaboration, and it is not obvious that every discretionary pod will scale within a quant risk framework. Execution costs also rise when human PMs trade less liquid names that the firm’s low-latency pipes were never built for. Some firms mitigate this with a central risk desk that can cross trades internally and recycle borrow across pods.

If the stories above share a lesson, it is that speed alone is no longer sufficient. The future belongs to firms that can arbitrage across time horizons — matching microstructure prowess with macro-agnostic stock selection, and doing so inside risk systems tough enough to survive the next volatility regime.

Subscribe to our Newsletter